Liverpool is a club that in the past has been the breeding ground of strikers and striking partnerships in general. From Ian St John and Roger
Hunt to Ian Rush and Kenny Dalglish; from Robbie Fowler and Michael Owen to
Fernando Torres and Luis Suarez, there have been a plethora of world-class
strikers that have come and gone from the Merseyside club.
The most recent example to follow suit has been Daniel
Sturridge. Signed from Chelsea in January 2013 and viewed as a ‘gamble’,
Sturridge quickly put rest to all doubters with an astonishing scoring record.
Despite numerous injuries and setbacks, he has always come back and done the
thing he loves doing: scoring goals. Sturridge recently came back after 5
months out and took only 12 minutes to score a goal against West Ham. But, why
have the other strikers at the club not been as prolific as Sturridge has. Kop
Chants takes a deeper insight into what makes Daniel Sturridge a rare breed.
Daniel Sturridge has been one of Liverpool's most prolific strikers |
The other main strikers currently at the club are Fabio
Borini, Rickie Lambert and Mario Balotelli. They cost close to 30 million and
transfer fees and have not even been close to replicating the return Sturridge
provides. But, why is that. They all play with the same teammates, formation
and manger. They all receive the same service. So, why is it that only
Sturridge can score goals.
It is not that the aforementioned three are bad players. On
the contrary, they are good players that have played for some of the best clubs
in the world. Borini has played for Chelsea and Roma whereas Balotelli has won
titles at Man City and Inter Milan. While Lambert might not be held in the same
regard, he notched up a pretty commendable total of close to 20 goals/assists
last season for Southampton. Past strikers like Andy Carroll and Robbie Keane
have also failed after coming in with big reputations. For every Luis Suarez,
there has been a Florent Sinama Pongolle and for every Fernando Torres, there
has been an Andy Carroll. Why are good strikers so hard to find when there are
so many around?
While some might argue that players like Balotelli and
Lambert do not ‘suit the system’ at Liverpool, that is a tired and worn out
excuse that just does not explain the situation anymore. While there is no
doubt that these players excel in certain systems that might be different to
the one Liverpool uses, there is also no question that these players have done
what has been asked of them before. Balotelli has led the line for his country
Italy as well as for AC Milan and Lambert led the line for Southampton last
year. These are players with goals and experience under their belt so just
plainly saying that they are not suited to the system is not really pertaining
to the truth.
The first aspect that separates Sturridge and other
world-class strikers from the rest is adherence to basics. While this might
seem fundamental to a professional player’s existence, the fact is that it is
very rarely done. Sturridge rarely does anything complex or over intricate. He
just sees an opening and shoots. He does not look to get the perfect goal and
his sole objective is to beat the keeper. It seems trivial in theory but in
reality it is difficult to execute. The toughest things in life are often the
simplest ones and the striker situation illustrates that. This is also shown by
the fact that Sturridge has the least shots to goals ratio showing his prowess.
A situation that I find interesting is that of Luis Suarez.
While he has left the reds as one of their most prolific goal scorers, it
should not be forgotten that during his first full season, Suarez was
profligacy personified. Instead of keeping things simple, he would always go
for the outrageous or the spectacular. It was only after Brendan Rodgers came
that Suarez became the prolific behemoth we know him to be. While most take
Suarez’s transformation to be improvement in skill, I attribute it to
simplicity in approach. One prime example of this was when he scored a goal
against Wigan by wrong footing Ali Al Habsi. Instead of trying to go for the
audacious chip, he waited and seized his opportunity when Al Habsi went to the
ground. These nuances separate the good from the best.
Another notion that might seem basic in its functioning is
that of the shot. The simple fact is Daniel Sturridge shoots more and therefore
gets more goals than his fellow strikers. Sturridge takes 3-4 shots on average
per game whereas Rickie Lamber takes only 2 shots. While Balotelli takes 4
shots on an average, most of them are audacious tries from outside the box (
close to 3 of the 4 shots). The fact is
that Sturridge forces the goalkeeper to act and do work. It is all well and
good mulling over where to shoot but in the end it has to work the goalkeeper
and Sturridge does that on a consistent basis. Instead of dawdling over the
ball, Sturridge is proactive and always on the move. These are in no way difficult
techniques but the best strikers execute them with consummate ease.
But, the most important aspect of a striker is most
definitely the ability to be in the right place at the right time. While goal
poachers are less in fashion now days, their success was attributed to their
awareness. The instinct to be in the right place at the right time is a very
difficult task and very few can do it easily. However, from his stint at
Liverpool, it is clear to all that Sturridge has the awareness and the striker’s
instinct to be a world-class striker. While Lambert has awareness, he does not
have that gut instinct that Sturridge possesses. For example, none of the other
strikers at the club could have scored the goal Sturridge scored against West
Ham. The awareness of where the goalkeeper and defenders were is not something that
can be taught. It is just pure intuition and that is why I believe Sturridge is
a rare breed.
Borini and Balotelli have ground to cover |
The simple fact is that for Liverpool to succeed, it has to
get two to three world class strikers and unless Balotelli, Borini or Lambert
up their game, Liverpool will have to go into the market. These players cannot
be trusted on right now and neither can Sturridge because of his injury issues.
So, it is imperative that Liverpool get that striker quickly. All the other top
teams in the world have two to three top strikers and for Liverpool to be in
that bracket, they have to follow suit.
Who do you think Liverpool should buy that can fill the
boots of Sturridge and be as prolific? Do you think the others are good enough?
Share your thoughts in the comments below.
No comments:
Post a Comment